WEKO3
アイテム
董仲舒「賢良対策」の信頼性について
https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/6327
https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/63276880623a-1bac-4d83-a8ae-de86d4dba641
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
gakuho01_95-1-01.pdf (1.4 MB)
|
|
|
|
gakuho02_95-1-01e.pdf (1.0 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-07-30 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 董仲舒「賢良対策」の信頼性について | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | On the Reliability of Dong Zhongshu's Civil Examination | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
深川, 真樹
× 深川, 真樹
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | A document in the Hanshu 漢書 entitled "Xianliang Duice"賢良對策, which is included in the biographic section on Dong Zhongshu has been regarded as Dong's reply to the questions asked of him by Emperor Wu on his imperial examination. But the authenticity of "Duice" has been questioned over doubts about its involvement with the so-called "establishment of Confucianism as state religion." To begin with, the mention of the tribe Kangju 康居 in the second part of "Duice" has been viewed as problematic on the grounds that the reference is not consistent with other descriptions indicating the date of "Duice," thus bringing the authenticity of the whole second part into dispute. It has also been argued that despite the fact that there was a prescribed form for answers to imperial examination questions during the Han Period, some parts of "Duice"not only do not conform to that form, but also contain incoherent statements. Thus, doubts have been raised as to whether the whole "Duice" is the work of Dong Zhongshu. However, the author of the present article feels that there are points in the above arguments which need to be reconsidered and has thus set about reexamining both "Duice" and the imperial examination questions posed by Emperor Wu in detail, and come to the following conclusions. First, although in the first part there certainly are places that do not conform to the answer format regarding imperial examination questions, this abnormality shows that the first part of "Duice" closely approximates to the answer which the emperor would himself read. Secondly, the third part of "Duice" presents no problems in terms of either content or form. Thirdly, the mention of the Kangju people in the second part of "Duice" does not contradict other descriptions that indicate the date of the document; and finally, there is no reason why the content which has been judged inconsistent in the past should have been judged so. In sum, it is highly probable that the extant version of "Duice" should be considered basically the work of Dong Zhongshu, and therefore the entire document, from which it is possible to grasp the very first system that Confucianists constructed in response to the imperial system, is extremely valuable in the study of Dong Zhongshu's ideas and subsequent Chinese thought institutions and culture. |
|||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
東洋学報 en : The Toyo Gakuho 巻 95, 号 1, p. 1-32, 発行日 2013-06 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 東洋文庫 | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0386-9067 | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00169858 | |||||||||||
