WEKO3
アイテム
アイニーの2年代記の執筆手順とその史料的価値：『イグド・アル＝ジュマーン』第17巻前半部の出典分析
https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/6103
https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/6103382c944c-cbef-4dea-81fc-3f1c6df11f18
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
gakuho01_86-4-06.pdf (1.6 MB)
|
|
|
|
gakuho02_86-4-04e.pdf (113.0 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-07-30 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | アイニーの2年代記の執筆手順とその史料的価値：『イグド・アル＝ジュマーン』第17巻前半部の出典分析 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | The Process of Writing al-‘Aynī's Two Chhronicles and Their Historical Value: A Historiographical Analysis of the First Half og Volume ⅩⅦ of the ‘Iqd al-jumān | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
中町, 信孝
× 中町, 信孝
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | This article deals with ʻIqd al-jumān fī ta’rīkh ahl al-zamān (hereafter, ʻIqd) and the Ta’rīkh al-badr fī awṣāf ahl ʻaṣr (hereafter, Badr), two chronicles written by the historian Badr al-dīn al-ʻAynī (762-855/1360-1451) during the Mamluk Period. A historiographical analysis of the first half of volume XVII of the ʻIqd; that is the section for 725/1324-735/1335, is helpful in reconstructing the al-‘Aynī’s writing process and ascertaining the historical value of the chronicles. Here the author mainly deals with two manuscripts of the ʻIqd, Topkapı Sarayı MS, Ahmet III 2911/a17 and Suleymaniye MS, Süleymaniye 835, and two manuscripts of the Badr, Süleymaniye MS, Süleymaniye 830-formerly regarded as a ‘Iqd manuscript-and the British Library MS, Add.22360.The colophons for these manuscripts state that al-‘Aynī wrote the Badr in 813/1410 at the latest and that he wrote the ʻIqd after 832/1428, facts that contradict the conventional theory that the Badr is an extract of the ʻIqd. The text of the ʻIqd identifies its two main sources as al-Yūsufī (d. 759/1357-58) and Ibn Kathīr (d. 774/1373), while the Badr ignores al-Yūsufī’s tradition and shares only Ibn Kathīr’s. Consequently, the Badr can be regarded as an independent work written prior to the ʻIqd, and al-‘Aynī seems to have rewritten the ʻIqd, based on the Badr, adding al-Yūsufī’s tradition.According to the author’s investigation, al-Yūsufī’s tradition contained in the ʻIqd could be found in al- Yūsufī’s chronicle, Nuzhat al-nāzir, which has been lost, except for the part covering 733 to 738 AH. On the other hand, Ibn Kathīr’s famous chronicle, al-Bidāya wa-l-nihāya, cannot be considered as a source used by al-‘Aynī because the poor information is provided on the period in question. Rather, a comparison between Ibn Kathīr’s tradition in the ʻIqd and the Badr with other contemporary chronicles leads the author to the hypothesis that al-‘Aynī’s source was the Nihāyat al-arab of al-Nuwayrī (d. 733/1333), for which part after 730 AH has been lost, or a lost chronicle of al-Birzālī (d. 739/1339). al-‘Aynī’s two chronicles can be regarded as highly important sources for the period, because they transmit a lot of information from contemporary sources that are now scattered and/or lost. | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
東洋学報 en : The Toyo Gakuho 巻 86, 号 4, p. 568-600, 発行日 2005-03 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 東洋文庫 | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0386-9067 | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00169858 | |||||||||||
