WEKO3
アイテム
ガルダン以前のオイラット：若松説再批判
https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5511
https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/55110946f20f-0972-4528-b281-26f08ac1ee56
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
gakuho01_65-1,2-05.pdf (1.3 MB)
|
|
|
|
65-1,2-04e.pdf (124.2 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-07-30 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | ガルダン以前のオイラット：若松説再批判 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | The Oyirad before Galdan : Wakamatsu’s theory criticized again | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
宮脇, 淳子
× 宮脇, 淳子
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | Junko Miyawaki once criticized, in her “The Oyirad of the 17th century: ‘The Dzungar Khanate’ revisited” (Shigaku Zasshi, Vol. 90, No. 10, 1981), a series of Hiroshi Wakamatsu’s works on Oyirad history which had until then been regarded as standard reference by Japanese historians. “The formation of the Zunghar Empire” (Tōyōshi Kenkyū, Vol. 41, No. 4, 1983), an article recently published by Wakamatsu, is a rebuttal of Miyawaki’s criticism. Contrary to its purpose, however, the article does not offer any effective answer to Miyawaki’s criticism; not only that, it commits even more errors. On the other hand, Miyawaki’s view has gained firmer substantiation through her subsequent studies. She points out that one can speak of a “Dzungar Khanate” being established only after 1676, the year in which Galdan of the Dzungars captured Očirtu Čečen Xān of the Xošūd. Wakamatsu, repeating errors in his earlier studies, maintains that Baatur qong tayjji, head of the Zunghar tribe, consolidated the Oirats into a nation-state, “the Zunghar Empire” (sic!), and enacted the Great Code of 1640, and concludes that the empire may be called a khanate after 1678, the year in which Galdan received the title of Boshogtu Khan from the Fifth Dalai Lama.In reality, the Mongol-Oyirad Code of 1640 was nothing more than a treaty of alliance concluded between the Qalqa Mongols and the Dörben Oyirad federation, parties who had hitherto been in hostile relations. It was ○asaγtu Qaγan of the Qalqa who convoked the assembly that enacted the Code, not Bātur Xong Tayiži as Wakamatsu assumes. Furthermore, the title of Xong Tayiži clearly indicates that there was an Oyirad Khan elsewhere, as in the Mongol usage “qong tayiǰi” meant a viceroy, the position next to Khanship. It Is known that at that time the head of the Xošūd tribe bore the title of the Khan of the Oyjrad federation, of which the Dzungars were only one of the member groups. Not a single historical source describes Bātur Xong Tayiži as the ruler of a “nation-state of the Oyirad peoples.” The distinction that Wakamatsu makes between an “empire” and a “khanate” is meaningless, if not for the purpose of avoiding a true issue. The gravest error committed by Wakamatsu is his blind adherence to studies published by Soviet scholars who tend to exaggerate the importance of the Dzungars, a people Who had been in the closest relations to the Russians among the Oyirad.○はǰの大文字 | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
東洋学報 en : The Toyo Gakuho 巻 65, 号 1・2, p. 91-120, 発行日 1984-01 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 東洋文庫 | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0386-9067 | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00169858 | |||||||||||
