ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 東洋学報
  2. 62巻
  3. 3・4号

ツォンカパの中観思想について

https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5457
https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5457
0ee63e3a-2b90-4b68-b2f2-0084ca9cf8f5
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
gakuho01_62-3,4-06.pdf gakuho01_62-3,4-06.pdf (1.7 MB)
gakuho02_62-3,4-06e.pdf gakuho02_62-3,4-06e.pdf (236.3 kB)
Item type 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1)
公開日 2018-07-30
タイトル
タイトル ツォンカパの中観思想について
タイトル
タイトル On the Mādhyamika Philosophy of Tsoṅ kha pa
言語
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
著者 松本, 史朗

× 松本, 史朗

松本, 史朗

ja-Kana マツモト, シロウ

en MATSUMOTO, Shiro

抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The Mādhyamika philosophy of Tsoṅ kha pa (1357-1419), the founder of the dGe lugs pa sect of Tibetan Buddhism, was criticized by Go ram pa (1429-1489), a scholar of the Sa skya pa sect, in his lTa baḥi śan ḥbyed (TŚ). The aim of this paper is to clarify the theories on the Madhyamika philosophy which are peculiar to Tsoṅn kha pa and to analyze the source of those theories through a study of the accounts in TŚ. According to TŚ, the theories peculiar to Tsoṅ kha pa, which are not accepted by Go ram pa, are as follows:Theory A: absolute negation is the highest reality. Theory B: the Svātantrika school of the Mādhyamika philosophy accepts that conventional reality is a product of one’s distinctive being by own-characteristic. Theory C: the Prāsaṅgika school of the Mādhyamika philosophy accepts that the conventional reality is established through verbal activity. Theory D: the apprehension of objects as real is an obstruction of defilement. Theory E: the obstruction of recognition is the product of the defilement. Theory F: the śrāvakas and the pratyekabuddhas also understand the non-substantiality of all objects. Theory G: destruction is real. Theory H: store-consciousness does not exist in conventional terms. Theory I: self-cognition does not exist in conventional terms. Theory J: the Svātantrika school must employ the independent argument in order to prove the non-substantiality of objects, while the Prāsaṅgika school must not employ it.Although it is certain that these tell theories are found in the main works of Tsoṅ kha pa, some of these theories seem to have been advocated earlier by the Mādhyamika philosophers preceding Tsoṅ kha pa, such as Candrakīrti (c. 600-650) and Red mdaḥ ba (l349-1412). Therefore, theory B only, which is not found in their works, can be determined as the theory peculiar to Tsoṅ kha pa. Because theory B is not found in gSer phreṅ, which Tsoṅ kha pa wrote before he met with dBu ma pa, and because it is stated in TŚ that Tsoṅ kha pa contrived the peculiar theories as mentioned above after he got inspiration from Mañjuśrī with the aid of dBu ma pa, we can conclude that theory B, the theory peculiar to Tsoṅ kha pa, was produced by his contact with dBu ma pa.
書誌情報 東洋学報
en : The Toyo Gakuho

巻 62, 号 3・4, p. 390-427, 発行日 1981-03
出版者
出版者 東洋文庫
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0386-9067
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00169858
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-19 13:13:18.653401
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3