WEKO3
アイテム
「『史記』の作者たち」について
https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5407
https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5407c43a50cf-dc82-4ec0-a9f0-4623ff1c4735
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
gakuho01_60-3,4-04.pdf (1.6 MB)
|
|
|
|
gakuho02_60-3,4-04e.pdf (202.6 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-07-30 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 「『史記』の作者たち」について | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | On the ‘Authors’ of the Shih chi | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
沢谷, 昭次
× 沢谷, 昭次
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | It seems a popular thesis in post-war Japan th Ssŭ-ma Ch’ien 司馬遷 must have written the Shih chi an individual work after his “conversion” caused by his serious experiences through the Li Ling 李陵 trial. There was a long traditional background in Japan in which the Shih chi had been thought a beautiful literary work.However, judging from the historical point of view, we cannot support the thesis because of our present research of the Autobiography of the Grand Historian 太史公自序, especially through the analysis of the connection between the Ch’un Ch’iu 春秋 and Confucius as a historical forerunner. In 1951, Ku Chieh-kang 顧頡剛 published a brilliant article on Ssŭ-ma T’an 司馬談 as a founder of the main plan and editorial structure of the Shih Chi, and we can recognize Ku’s assertions through comparative analysis on the Biography of Ssŭ-ma Ch’ien of the Han Shu 漢書司馬遷伝 with the Shih Chi.Then, we can make some proposals about ‘authors’ of the Shih Chi as below.1. On the ‘authors’ of the Shih Chi, we must point out Ssŭ-ma T’an as the first main planner and editor as well as Ssŭ-ma Ch’ien, who completed the work after his father’s death.2. Moreover, about the views of ancient Chinese history and Confucius’s Ch’un Ch’iu in the Shih Chi,the ‘authors’ of the Shih Chi had fluctuated between ‘Shu’ (述=recording for the glorifying of the past and present period）, and ‘Tsuo’ (作=holy writing of the prospects for the future), and these fluctuating attitudes of the ‘authors’ were reflected in the contradictory passages in the Autobiography of the Grand Historian.3. Finally, the traditional Chinese method of historical writings, used typically by the ‘authors’ of the Shih Chi, must have been called rather an annotated editing, ‘mosaic’ as Chavanne’s term, than a historical writing in modern use. | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
東洋学報 en : The Toyo Gakuho 巻 60, 号 3・4, p. 341-372, 発行日 1978-03 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 東洋文庫 | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0386-9067 | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00169858 | |||||||||||
