WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "8440f6a5-3c0b-47ff-a8c1-99fec3e6901f"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 2, "id": "5292", "owners": [2], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "5292"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp:00005292", "sets": ["649"]}, "author_link": ["9287"], "item_10001_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1975-03", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "2~4", "bibliographicPageEnd": "277", "bibliographicPageStart": "249", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "56", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "東洋学報"}, {"bibliographic_title": "The Toyo Gakuho", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_10001_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "In the Reform of 1894, the question of a loan from Japan to Korea was raised by the New Progressives headed by Yu Kiljŏn on the Korean side and Ambassador Inoue Kaoru on the Japanese. The New Progressives, who had pushed the violent First Reform, were stalled by resistance from other factions whom they had excluded from policy making. Their economic reforms were ineffective, and Korea was slipping into a financial crisis. On the other side, Inoue intended to emulate Great Britain’s Egyptian policy. He considered it most important to economically subordinate Korea to Japan by means of a large amount of loan for realization of the objective of the Reform, which was to turn Korea into a virtual protectorate of Japan.Negotiations for the loan, however, did not proceed smoothly as various conflicts came to the surface in their course. Firstly, there appeared a split between Inoue and Mutsu Munemitsu, Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs of that time, over the program of the Reform. Mutsu was of opinion that securing concessions was most important for realizing the objective of the Reform. This division of their opinions developed also into their difference over how to assess Korea’s financial situation and on what terms to offer the loan. The negotiations bogged down because of the internal disagreement on the Japanese side.Secondly this delay brought to the surface a factional split between the New Progressives and the Moderates headed by Kim Hongjip on the one side and the Old Progressives headed by Pak Yŏnghyo on the other. The Old Progressives rallied around the king and called for promotion of the Reform with a Korean initiative. This dissent developed into a general resignation of the Cabinet, deepening Inoue’s sense of crisis.Thirdly, after an accord was reached between Inoue and Mutsu, there surfaced a division between the respective promoters of the Reform in Korea and Japan. The political leaders of Korea were almost unanimously against the harsh Japanese terms for the loan which was to be made in bank notes, as destructive to Korea’s independence.The loan contract was concluded on March 30th, 1895, on terms which fell short of the initial Japanese expectations. Inoue’s plans for the Reform were not realized. The intended establishment of a uniform governing system ran into a resistance from the political tradition of Korea, and the demands for concessions antagonized the political leaders of Korea and the envoys from European and American countries. What caused this situation was the coming to the surface of various conflicts in the process of the negotiation for the loan. The loan question was significant in this sense.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10001_publisher_8": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "東洋文庫"}]}, "item_10001_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00169858", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "森山, 茂徳"}, {"creatorName": "モリヤマ, シゲノリ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}, {"creatorName": "MORIYAMA, Shigenori", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "9287", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}, {"nameIdentifier": "9000398027767", "nameIdentifierScheme": "CiNii ID", "nameIdentifierURI": "http://ci.nii.ac.jp/nrid/9000398027767"}, {"nameIdentifier": "50107497", "nameIdentifierScheme": "e-Rad", "nameIdentifierURI": "https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/ja/search/?qm=50107497"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-08-22"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "gakuho01_56-2,3,4-04.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.5 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1500000.0, "url": {"label": "gakuho01_56-2,3,4-04.pdf", "url": "https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/5292/files/gakuho01_56-2,3,4-04.pdf"}, "version_id": "6965a2dd-7afb-422f-9559-142d10defd24"}, {"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-08-22"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 1, "filename": "gakuho02_56-2,3,4-04e.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "557.7 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 557700.0, "url": {"label": "gakuho02_56-2,3,4-04e.pdf", "url": "https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/5292/files/gakuho02_56-2,3,4-04e.pdf"}, "version_id": "f44d9d38-94ea-4814-bb50-38bfebd14156"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "journal article", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "甲午改革における借款問題:井上馨の関与した第二次改革と朝鮮指導者層の対応を中心として", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "甲午改革における借款問題:井上馨の関与した第二次改革と朝鮮指導者層の対応を中心として"}, {"subitem_title": "The Loan Question in the Reform of 1894 : The Second Reform involving Inoue Kaoru and the Response of the Korean Leadership", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "10001", "owner": "2", "path": ["649"], "permalink_uri": "https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5292", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2018-07-30"}, "publish_date": "2018-07-30", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "5292", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["甲午改革における借款問題:井上馨の関与した第二次改革と朝鮮指導者層の対応を中心として"], "weko_shared_id": 2}
甲午改革における借款問題:井上馨の関与した第二次改革と朝鮮指導者層の対応を中心として
https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5292
https://toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5292af89793e-2b66-4fdc-8146-cb3de7a4b5f7
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
gakuho01_56-2,3,4-04.pdf (1.5 MB)
|
|
|
gakuho02_56-2,3,4-04e.pdf (557.7 kB)
|
|
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2018-07-30 | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | 甲午改革における借款問題:井上馨の関与した第二次改革と朝鮮指導者層の対応を中心として | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
タイトル | The Loan Question in the Reform of 1894 : The Second Reform involving Inoue Kaoru and the Response of the Korean Leadership | |||||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||||||||
著者 |
森山, 茂徳
× 森山, 茂徳
WEKO
9287
|
|||||||||||
抄録 | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
内容記述 | In the Reform of 1894, the question of a loan from Japan to Korea was raised by the New Progressives headed by Yu Kiljŏn on the Korean side and Ambassador Inoue Kaoru on the Japanese. The New Progressives, who had pushed the violent First Reform, were stalled by resistance from other factions whom they had excluded from policy making. Their economic reforms were ineffective, and Korea was slipping into a financial crisis. On the other side, Inoue intended to emulate Great Britain’s Egyptian policy. He considered it most important to economically subordinate Korea to Japan by means of a large amount of loan for realization of the objective of the Reform, which was to turn Korea into a virtual protectorate of Japan.Negotiations for the loan, however, did not proceed smoothly as various conflicts came to the surface in their course. Firstly, there appeared a split between Inoue and Mutsu Munemitsu, Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs of that time, over the program of the Reform. Mutsu was of opinion that securing concessions was most important for realizing the objective of the Reform. This division of their opinions developed also into their difference over how to assess Korea’s financial situation and on what terms to offer the loan. The negotiations bogged down because of the internal disagreement on the Japanese side.Secondly this delay brought to the surface a factional split between the New Progressives and the Moderates headed by Kim Hongjip on the one side and the Old Progressives headed by Pak Yŏnghyo on the other. The Old Progressives rallied around the king and called for promotion of the Reform with a Korean initiative. This dissent developed into a general resignation of the Cabinet, deepening Inoue’s sense of crisis.Thirdly, after an accord was reached between Inoue and Mutsu, there surfaced a division between the respective promoters of the Reform in Korea and Japan. The political leaders of Korea were almost unanimously against the harsh Japanese terms for the loan which was to be made in bank notes, as destructive to Korea’s independence.The loan contract was concluded on March 30th, 1895, on terms which fell short of the initial Japanese expectations. Inoue’s plans for the Reform were not realized. The intended establishment of a uniform governing system ran into a resistance from the political tradition of Korea, and the demands for concessions antagonized the political leaders of Korea and the envoys from European and American countries. What caused this situation was the coming to the surface of various conflicts in the process of the negotiation for the loan. The loan question was significant in this sense. | |||||||||||
書誌情報 |
東洋学報 en : The Toyo Gakuho 巻 56, 号 2~4, p. 249-277, 発行日 1975-03 |
|||||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||||
出版者 | 東洋文庫 | |||||||||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | AN00169858 |