@article{oai:toyo-bunko.repo.nii.ac.jp:00006095,
 author = {宮崎, 聖明 and MIYAZAKI, Toshiaki},
 issue = {3},
 journal = {東洋学報, The Toyo Gakuho},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {From the Northern Song 北宋 Dynasty’s Taizong 太宗 era to its Zhenzong 真宗 era, most of the proposals for bureaucratic reform aimed at the revival of the Shangshusheng 尚書省. The elite of this time were of the opinion that the Song Dynasty was the successor to the Tang 唐 Dynasty, and this opinion affected these proposal, which asserted erasion of bureaucrat’s name of Tang Dynasty and Five Dynasties 五代. Especially, these proposals came at the time when the Yanyun sixteen states 燕雲十六州 could no longer be retained and the dynasty’s territory extension policy came to a standstill. This shows that bureaucratic reforms were proposed as a means for legitimizing the Song Dynasty by reviving Tang Dynasty institutions, instead of recovering lost territory. However, the proposal to revive the Shangshusheng was dropped during the second half of the Zhenzong era, after the affirmation of Song Dynasty no longer required an absolute return to the Tang Dynasty system. During the Renzong 仁宗 era, the discord arose over the terms “guan” 官 (jiluguan 寄禄官, a designation of the rank and stipend of an official) and “chaiqian” 差遣１ (designation of the duties of an official), and bureaucratic reform was again proposed to solve this problem. Unlike the reform proposals prior to the Zhenzong era, these did not call for a complete return to the Tang system, but were also seeking the Han 漢 Dynasty system and the idea of ‘‘Zhouli” 周礼 as their basis. The same tendency can be seen in the dispute about “jiyiguan” 集議官 (officials called to conferences in the Shangshudusheng 尚書都省). Such change in logic was influenced by the elite’s confidence in the legitimacy of the Song Dynasty, which had maintained political unification. The Renzong era proposals were a manifestation of the desire to implement bureaucratic reform as an original enterprise, based not on the dynasty, but rather on a “modern age” for the Song Dynasty, referring to the ancient dynasties for the basis.},
 pages = {359--389},
 title = {北宋前期における官制改革論と集議官論争：元豊官制改革前史},
 volume = {86},
 year = {2004},
 yomi = {ミヤザキ, トシアキ}
}